Ir al contenido principal

Is design dead?


I think programmers are artists, and have evolved greatly... why do I say that? Before, code design was just to sit and code, there were no official frameworks, strategies or workstyles, now we have many paradigms, delivery styles, testing, etc etc.

It's always cheaper to test than to correct once a software is in production, that's why we evolved our methodologies and styles over the years. 

On the other side, extreme programming is keeping it simple, even getting to the point of hot having a design at all. This is a cheaper approach for development because you actually don't have any extra or unnecessary effort.

Maybe a limit that can be found in extreme programming is the lack of diagrams, it's practically impossible to implement UML in it. Diagrams are quite useful of how is the interaction between components and gives visibility from high to very specific level.


Comentarios

Entradas populares de este blog

Microservices

From monolithic to microservices . This is dangerous and even though this is how my mind works, sometimes, may be limiting our minds. The idea of microservices, I believe is an amazing approach to development, and much more currently that we have whatever/anything/everything as a service , companies tend to have cloud solutions and plug n' play compatibility with different services. The microservices architecture must be an approach that jumps into your mind immediately whenever you think of implementing something in a company, or as a developer, developing for a company. Nothing's more scalable and easier than services connected in between just by API endpoints. I'll defend microservices architecture all the way. (:

Ready player one

I have many conflicted feelings about this book, I love the idea of a fantasy world that your mind is the limit-ish (let's don't count gaming experience restrictions set up by the particular activities in Oasis), but hate the why  people love this same idea. The Oasis is an infinite, amazing playground, it may be a shelter because you're having a bad time, it may be a way to get distracted of how your boss treated your that one meeting or it could mean that the real world just isn't enough for you. We're not that far from getting there, it's not that visible but people have gotten to that point, people spending thousands of dollars in Candy Crush, people more worried about their Second Life's dog than their real life pug, or people dying due to a burnout playing League of Legends or World of Warcraft... all of these great games, to be honest, but with that greatness comes a great vulnerability and ease for people prone to addictions. Still out of this id...

Wargames

Sci-fi, I feel is just opening a window to the future. Many things considered sci-fi in 80s movies are quite a reality now, you can pick almost any movie prior to the 90s and you will most likely find the similarities immediately. The idea of having a teenager hack into a government's pc is not quite far from reality, in the recent 20 years we have found things like people hacking into systems accessing IP cameras or back when Valve was on their younger phases, a teenager found a way to get into their system and get a game's source code, he only wanted to see what the game was like... just like in Wargames. I mean he didn't almost cause a nuclear war, but he got a big scare out of it. Wargames not only is a quite enjoyable movie, it's a lesson in some subjects such as security, responsibility or accountability of matters. This movie raises the question... are we going to be able to program in such a way that our own logic doesn't play against us? (insert movie...